<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: (individual-specific) Status Quo Option? - Discrete Choice experiment in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54357#M30715</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see in JMP &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design of Experiments&lt;/STRONG&gt; for the design answers and &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Consumer Research&lt;/STRONG&gt; for the analysis answers. Each book devotes an entire chapter&amp;nbsp;to choice experiments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-03T10:45:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>(individual-specific) Status Quo Option? - Discrete Choice experiment</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54353#M30712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a fresh community member. I can't find a fundamental information for my design in the documentation (unless I use wrong wording). My discrete choice experiment (DCE) is about analyzing preferences of car-sharing users and non-users. The important point is the &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;status quo option&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; (important in DCE) which depends on your initial transport mode (e.g. bike, public transport, private car, etc). So below is a list of my interrogations in order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1- I would like to have a status quo option (not an opt-out or "none of these" option) in the experiment. Is that possible to implement it in JMP? How? I can't find a tutorial on that. Maybe I am not using the correct vocabulary, then what is the wording in JMP to talk about "status quo" option? Does it have to do with "disallowed combinations"? Then how can I specify my status quo with this type of command?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2- Assuming, it is possible to implement a status quo option in JMP, is it possible to make it vary according to a preliminary answer that respondents give? E.g. in a preliminary question "what is your current transport mode", if the respondent answers "private/own car" then How do I make the choice set conditional to this answer (i.e. the respondent would then be presented different options from the private car status quo option)? If I don't make it conditional, then I may end up with a choice set like the following:&amp;nbsp; 1) private car, 2) car-sharing and 3) status quo = private car (again...). The respondent would choose between two private car options in that case...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3- Assuming, it is possible to implement a status quo option in JMP and make it individual-specific, is it possible to go further and specify the levels of each attribute in the status quo option ? E.g. if the individual answered that her current transport mode is "private car" &lt;U&gt;and&lt;/U&gt; that it costs her ""XXX $"" much per month (attribute COST) and has ""electric"" engine (attribute ENGINE), is it possible to implement these individual-specific attribute levels (""XXX $"" and ""electric"") in the status quo option? (or only possible to label the status quo "private car" with no choice/display of the levels). This question is pretty much linked to question 2. I really think that providing a status quo option with the real data of each respondent is the best I could implement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4- Assuming it is too complicated to do this (questions 2 and/or 3), what would be an alternative for my experiment using JMP? Any suggestion or indication in the documentation? (opt out option? forcing choice between two alternatives whatever the status quo? I think these two suggestions make me lose some info unfortunately).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 06:25:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54353#M30712</guid>
      <dc:creator>RiMaDoN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-04T06:25:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (individual-specific) Status Quo Option? - Discrete Choice experiment</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54357#M30715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see in JMP &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design of Experiments&lt;/STRONG&gt; for the design answers and &lt;STRONG&gt;Help&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Books&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Consumer Research&lt;/STRONG&gt; for the analysis answers. Each book devotes an entire chapter&amp;nbsp;to choice experiments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54357#M30715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-03T10:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: (individual-specific) Status Quo Option? - Discrete Choice experiment</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54364#M30721</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer. I am exclusively interested in the design for now. I checked these two documents before posting my message. "Status quo" is a word that is never used in any of these documents. What would be the alternative wording then please? I think this may only be a question of wording here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- I saw "&lt;STRONG&gt;None of these&lt;/STRONG&gt;" option (meaning there is no preference across the presented alternatives), which is different from status quo, so this is not what I am looking for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- I saw the "&lt;STRONG&gt;prior specification&lt;/STRONG&gt;" section, which I still have a hard time linking properly to the status quo option. How do you ensure that the status quo is always one of the profiles in the choice set? If I understand well, it has to do with the "&lt;STRONG&gt;number of surveys&lt;/STRONG&gt;" right? Does it mean that the number of surveys I enter is equal to the number of possible status quo (in my case the number of possible transport modes)? If yes, then how do I make the status quo option &lt;U&gt;conditional to&lt;/U&gt; the preliminary answer to the "current transport mode" question?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please, do you confirm that the document sections about "number of surveys" and "prior specification" I just mentioned are the ones that answer my question about &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;individual-specific status quo&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;? Or am I wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you again for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 11:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/individual-specific-Status-Quo-Option-Discrete-Choice-experiment/m-p/54364#M30721</guid>
      <dc:creator>RiMaDoN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-03T11:58:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

