<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How do I analyze an unbalanced incomplete block design in JMP? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-analyze-an-unbalanced-incomplete-block-design-in-JMP/m-p/53694#M30345</link>
    <description>It’s nice to be able to plan your blocks and have them be orthogonal, but when you can’t, it’s not that big of a deal. The probability that your blocks become highly correlated with your fully randomized factors is pretty low. Just run it and keep track of when the runs are completed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for the analysis, I think you’re overthinking this. Just add your day block as a random effect and do everything else normally.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-23T00:26:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How do I analyze an unbalanced incomplete block design in JMP?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-analyze-an-unbalanced-incomplete-block-design-in-JMP/m-p/53682#M30339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am considering a DOE situation where I want to block the runs by day to account for hidden variability between days.&amp;nbsp; At the same time, the test facility cannot reasonably measure the same number of runs each day.&amp;nbsp; They want to measure as many points as possible each day.&amp;nbsp; How do I maximize the use of the facility when things are running while also blocking the runs in a statistically valid manner?&amp;nbsp; What is the best method for designing and analyzing an experiment under these conditions?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the facility, lets assume if things go bad, the number of runs in a day might be only 3-7, and if things go well, the number of runs in a day could be anywhere from 15-25.&amp;nbsp; My thought was to set up the blocks with 15 runs/day, understanding that we will reach that some days but not others.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this scenario is referred to as an unbalanced incomplete block design, or mixed model design, and the appropriate anlysis method would be Skillings-Mask Test, which is only available in JMP Pro.&amp;nbsp; Is this the most statistically correct method?&amp;nbsp; What are my options if I only have basic JMP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-analyze-an-unbalanced-incomplete-block-design-in-JMP/m-p/53682#M30339</guid>
      <dc:creator>StevenCHowell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T19:30:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How do I analyze an unbalanced incomplete block design in JMP?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-analyze-an-unbalanced-incomplete-block-design-in-JMP/m-p/53694#M30345</link>
      <description>It’s nice to be able to plan your blocks and have them be orthogonal, but when you can’t, it’s not that big of a deal. The probability that your blocks become highly correlated with your fully randomized factors is pretty low. Just run it and keep track of when the runs are completed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for the analysis, I think you’re overthinking this. Just add your day block as a random effect and do everything else normally.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:26:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-do-I-analyze-an-unbalanced-incomplete-block-design-in-JMP/m-p/53694#M30345</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-23T00:26:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

