<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic URGENT Help with Likert and Parameter Estimates in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51065#M29003</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running a Fit Model with where I'm testing a dependent variable (Likert responses) to several independent x variables (also Likert ). both sets are 1 - 7 responses from strongly disagree to strongly agree.&amp;nbsp; My issue is in the reporting.&amp;nbsp; How do I assess the overall estimate instead of just the individual matches looking at image below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="jmp2.png" style="width: 936px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9287i568DA7B6FBC37495/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="jmp2.png" alt="jmp2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to achieve output like shown in spss&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="SPSS output" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9288iCC47B294E5C58292/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="spss 1.png" alt="SPSS output" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;SPSS output&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;where variables like bargaining power over key suppliers are rolled up.&amp;nbsp; Or is it that I only need to use the one that matches what I was testing for (the one most influential as in those that marked 7?)???&amp;nbsp; Please help.&amp;nbsp; Or if I need to organize my data differently or do a different test any direction would be great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FVasquez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-12T02:39:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>URGENT Help with Likert and Parameter Estimates</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51065#M29003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am running a Fit Model with where I'm testing a dependent variable (Likert responses) to several independent x variables (also Likert ). both sets are 1 - 7 responses from strongly disagree to strongly agree.&amp;nbsp; My issue is in the reporting.&amp;nbsp; How do I assess the overall estimate instead of just the individual matches looking at image below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="jmp2.png" style="width: 936px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9287i568DA7B6FBC37495/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="jmp2.png" alt="jmp2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to achieve output like shown in spss&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="SPSS output" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/9288iCC47B294E5C58292/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="spss 1.png" alt="SPSS output" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;SPSS output&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;where variables like bargaining power over key suppliers are rolled up.&amp;nbsp; Or is it that I only need to use the one that matches what I was testing for (the one most influential as in those that marked 7?)???&amp;nbsp; Please help.&amp;nbsp; Or if I need to organize my data differently or do a different test any direction would be great.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51065#M29003</guid>
      <dc:creator>FVasquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T02:39:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: URGENT Help with Likert and Parameter Estimates</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51103#M29024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You set up your regression in JMP as a nominal logistic, so you are regressing the generalized logits against the linear predictor. That model means that if there are&amp;nbsp;7 levels in your response, then there will be 6 logits and 6 sets of parameters, one set for each logit. Your linear predictor is a combination of categorical factors except for Firm Size. That parameterization further expands the number of estimates within each set.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can you use the Effect Likelihood Ratio Tests to assess the significance of the individual terms in the model? This table appears below the Parameter Estimates table.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51103#M29024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T16:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: URGENT Help with Likert and Parameter Estimates</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51109#M29027</link>
      <description>1. Thank you so much for responding I really appreciate your insight&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Next, yes I can use the results below but am unsure what I would list as the estimate or if I need to list each one (or the most important ones).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’m trying to use the same fields as a different study that is depicted in the second image. Do you know how I would find those results?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:54:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51109#M29027</guid>
      <dc:creator>FVasquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T16:54:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: URGENT Help with Likert and Parameter Estimates</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51113#M29029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am not familiar with this study or the way that SPSS might parameterize the nominal logistic regression model. There are two possibilities that you might consider:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;The published study that you refer to might have treated the categorical predictors as if they were continuous variables. There would then be a single estimate for each predictor.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Your response uses a Likert scale so you could the ordinal&amp;nbsp;modeling type for Y. Ordinal logistic&amp;nbsp;regression uses cumulative logits and you would have a single estimate for each predictor.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You might also include multiple correspondence analysis in your study to explore the associations among these&amp;nbsp;categorical Y and X.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/URGENT-Help-with-Likert-and-Parameter-Estimates/m-p/51113#M29029</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-12T17:14:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

