<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Adjusting for clustered data in regression in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50271#M28600</link>
    <description>Normally, I would want to make state and hospital[state] random effects. That would dramatically reduce the impact of the total number of parameters to estimate. However, random effects are not supported for GLMs in JMP.&lt;BR /&gt;You could do a cluster analysis and use the clusters in place of states.&lt;BR /&gt;If you have access to SAS, you could use Proc GLIMMIX to do the mixed model GLM.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-26T15:26:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adjusting for clustered data in regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50268#M28598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am looking to predict the proportion of patients in a hospital with a specific disease, adjusting for hospital characteristics. However, the data are clustered&amp;nbsp;(hospitals clustered within states) and I want to adjust for this, too. I am using JMP Pro 13.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the proper approach to use a Generalized Linear Model and select state with the "Nest" button? This seems correct, but when I do that JMP includes each state (n=51) as a variable. This is effectively what I want, but adds a lot of DF and variables to a data set with relatively few observations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I doing this right, or is there a better way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50268#M28598</guid>
      <dc:creator>jswislar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-26T15:00:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjusting for clustered data in regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50271#M28600</link>
      <description>Normally, I would want to make state and hospital[state] random effects. That would dramatically reduce the impact of the total number of parameters to estimate. However, random effects are not supported for GLMs in JMP.&lt;BR /&gt;You could do a cluster analysis and use the clusters in place of states.&lt;BR /&gt;If you have access to SAS, you could use Proc GLIMMIX to do the mixed model GLM.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50271#M28600</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-26T15:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjusting for clustered data in regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50273#M28602</link>
      <description>Thank you for the quick response. Would the new cluster variable be entered as a "Nest" variable in GLM? I already know there are 4 clusters I can group the states into.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:30:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50273#M28602</guid>
      <dc:creator>jswislar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-26T15:30:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjusting for clustered data in regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50275#M28604</link>
      <description>You certainly can do that.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 15:34:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Adjusting-for-clustered-data-in-regression/m-p/50275#M28604</guid>
      <dc:creator>cwillden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-26T15:34:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

