<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Batch effect adjustment using Housekeeping Genes in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Batch-effect-adjustment-using-Housekeeping-Genes/m-p/49513#M28151</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In JMP Genomics, you can use Loess Normalization within Expression&amp;gt;Normalization to specify a control set or housekeeping set of genes for normalization.&amp;nbsp; See documentation here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.jmp.com/support/downloads/JMPG90_documentation/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm#href=PA_G_EX_0342.html" target="_self"&gt;http://www.jmp.com/support/downloads/JMPG90_documentation/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm#href=PA_G_EX_0342.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris_Kirchberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-10T18:52:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Batch effect adjustment using Housekeeping Genes</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Batch-effect-adjustment-using-Housekeeping-Genes/m-p/49437#M28114</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, starting from a txt file with count data, I am analysing RNAseq data from three different independent&amp;nbsp; experiments which should be merged into a single analysis. Sample characteristics, such as disease conditions, are perfectly confounded within the batches. The use of housekeeping genes, such as those suggested by Eisenberg et al. (&lt;A href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.010" target="_blank"&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.05.010&lt;/A&gt;), could be one way of addressing the batch effects. Is there a way in JMP Genomics which allows specifying sets of genes which could be used to adjust the batches?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for your time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 19:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Batch-effect-adjustment-using-Housekeeping-Genes/m-p/49437#M28114</guid>
      <dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-09T19:30:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Batch effect adjustment using Housekeeping Genes</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Batch-effect-adjustment-using-Housekeeping-Genes/m-p/49513#M28151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In JMP Genomics, you can use Loess Normalization within Expression&amp;gt;Normalization to specify a control set or housekeeping set of genes for normalization.&amp;nbsp; See documentation here:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.jmp.com/support/downloads/JMPG90_documentation/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm#href=PA_G_EX_0342.html" target="_self"&gt;http://www.jmp.com/support/downloads/JMPG90_documentation/wwhelp/wwhimpl/js/html/wwhelp.htm#href=PA_G_EX_0342.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:52:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Batch-effect-adjustment-using-Housekeeping-Genes/m-p/49513#M28151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris_Kirchberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-10T18:52:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

