<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it relevant to use the Stepwise platform with a nominal response? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48780#M27732</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For the variable selection part of your question, maybe try using the Partition platform, or the Factor Screening Utility (Analyze, Screening) to pick out better variables. &amp;nbsp;A decision tree (and if you have JMP Pro, Bootstrap Forest or Boosted Tree) can out perform a logistic regression. The bootstrap and boosted trees nearly always out perform the logistic method. In these model platforms, look at the column contributions to find the variables that explain the variation in your response best. (these things are all in JMP 12 and 13.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Ordinal Logistic regression assumes a sequence to the levels because its calculating the probability of the next higher level, not the probability of each level. &amp;nbsp; Its not always a good solution, but it might be possible to cluster your levels into just two groups so that a nominal logistic is possible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-18T03:36:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it relevant to use the Stepwise platform with a nominal response?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48681#M27686</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to do variable selection before running a nominal logistic regression. However since "nominal responses are treated as &lt;SPAN class="Search_Result_Highlight"&gt;ordinal&lt;/SPAN&gt; responses in the logistic &lt;SPAN class="Search_Result_Highlight"&gt;stepwise&lt;/SPAN&gt; regression fitting procedure" I wonder if it is correct to use the stepwise process with a purely nominal response variable. Why is not it possible to use the Stepwise platform directly on a nominal response? What is the impact of treating a nominal variable as ordinal during this step?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for your inputs!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:01:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48681#M27686</guid>
      <dc:creator>anne_sa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-15T13:01:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it relevant to use the Stepwise platform with a nominal response?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48780#M27732</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For the variable selection part of your question, maybe try using the Partition platform, or the Factor Screening Utility (Analyze, Screening) to pick out better variables. &amp;nbsp;A decision tree (and if you have JMP Pro, Bootstrap Forest or Boosted Tree) can out perform a logistic regression. The bootstrap and boosted trees nearly always out perform the logistic method. In these model platforms, look at the column contributions to find the variables that explain the variation in your response best. (these things are all in JMP 12 and 13.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Ordinal Logistic regression assumes a sequence to the levels because its calculating the probability of the next higher level, not the probability of each level. &amp;nbsp; Its not always a good solution, but it might be possible to cluster your levels into just two groups so that a nominal logistic is possible?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48780#M27732</guid>
      <dc:creator>Byron_JMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-18T03:36:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it relevant to use the Stepwise platform with a nominal response?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48812#M27743</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer and explanations! I'll try using these platforms to select my variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-relevant-to-use-the-Stepwise-platform-with-a-nominal/m-p/48812#M27743</guid>
      <dc:creator>anne_sa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-18T16:19:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

