<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38298#M22420</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Of course you can set more stringent criteria for this test. This aspect of the TOST is not a statistical matter, though, unless you mean by "more stringent" that you&amp;nbsp;require greater significance (lower alpha level) in the test.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The distribution of the historical data refers to individual outcomes. The TOST is a test of the mean of the population. The historical data could be used to estimate the mean and the standard deviation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use &lt;STRONG&gt;DOE&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design Diagnostics&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Sample Size and Power&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;One Sample Mean&lt;/STRONG&gt;. It turns out that sample size is the same as for TOST. The difference to detect is the difference between the mean and the criteria limit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You have specifications so you could use them for your new criteria. You could determine a reasonable margin of safety. For example, in my example above, if I want a 50% margin, then I would set my criteria as y &amp;gt; 9.95 and y &amp;lt; 10.05. You don't need the distribution of historical data to set the criteria.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:49:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-19T12:49:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38288#M22412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm analyzing historical data and need to find meaningful equivalence acceptance criteria between groups and calculate sample size for a new experiments. How can I set Practically equivalence acceptance criteria and I'm using the DOE Sample Size and Power calculator K means. Which prospective means should I enter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank You&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38288#M22412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T08:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38294#M22416</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The practically equivalent acceptance criteria are not statistical confidence bounds or limits. Like specifications, they are based on unacceptable performance or failure criteria. You might, for example, determine that a particular attribute of&amp;nbsp; the material, part, or device must be within 0.1 of 10 or else it does not perform as claimed. The practically equivalent&amp;nbsp;acceptance criteria are y &amp;gt; 9.9 and y &amp;lt; 10.1 in this case. So the answer to your question is that they come from specifications.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The equivalence test that you mention (TOST)&amp;nbsp;is a pair of hypothesis tests where the acceptance criteria define the null. hypothesis:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;H0: mean &amp;lt; 9.9 or mean &amp;gt; 10.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:11:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38294#M22416</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T12:11:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38296#M22418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank You,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have historical values and all are within specification, but I would like to set equivalency acceptance criteria more stringent than specifications, to demonstrate for examples that two lots are practically equivalent. Can I set stringent equivalency acceptance criteria setting a rule from the distribution of historical data?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also I need to set Sample size for the test from the Sample size calculator (Could I&amp;nbsp;use Sample size calculator for a t-test and which prospective means do I enter in the calculator)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38296#M22418</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T12:25:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38298#M22420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Of course you can set more stringent criteria for this test. This aspect of the TOST is not a statistical matter, though, unless you mean by "more stringent" that you&amp;nbsp;require greater significance (lower alpha level) in the test.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The distribution of the historical data refers to individual outcomes. The TOST is a test of the mean of the population. The historical data could be used to estimate the mean and the standard deviation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use &lt;STRONG&gt;DOE&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design Diagnostics&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Sample Size and Power&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;One Sample Mean&lt;/STRONG&gt;. It turns out that sample size is the same as for TOST. The difference to detect is the difference between the mean and the criteria limit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You have specifications so you could use them for your new criteria. You could determine a reasonable margin of safety. For example, in my example above, if I want a 50% margin, then I would set my criteria as y &amp;gt; 9.95 and y &amp;lt; 10.05. You don't need the distribution of historical data to set the criteria.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:49:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38298#M22420</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T12:49:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38299#M22421</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok many thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;DOE&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design Diagnostics&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Sample Size and Power&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;One Sample Mean &lt;/STRONG&gt;it also aks me for Std dev, is this from historical data?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38299#M22421</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pops</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T13:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38304#M22424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Exactly!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/38304#M22424</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-19T17:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47278#M26956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to determine the sample size for a two sample equivalance test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like alpha and beta to be 0.05.&amp;nbsp; A practical difference is &amp;lt;-10 or &amp;gt;10.&amp;nbsp; My standard deviation is 9.43.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How would I set this up using the one sample test sample size in jmp?&amp;nbsp; Would you please be specific as to what I should enter in each field.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:25:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47278#M26956</guid>
      <dc:creator>clt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-15T17:25:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47287#M26961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;*** NOTE 1: I updated my&amp;nbsp;original reply because&amp;nbsp;it did not address the &lt;STRONG&gt;two&lt;/STRONG&gt; sample test for equivalence. ***&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*** NOTE 2: This method is for a hypothesized difference. It should &lt;STRONG&gt;NOT&lt;/STRONG&gt; be used for calculating the sample size for equivalence.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe that you determine the sample size for a TOST of equivalence exactly the same as a two sample test of the mean. I don't have the paper handy (it is an old one) but we get lucky here and they are the same. Select &lt;STRONG&gt;DOE&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Design Diagnostics&lt;/STRONG&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Sample Size and Power&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Click &lt;STRONG&gt;Two Sample Mean&lt;/STRONG&gt; and enter your values as seen below, then click &lt;STRONG&gt;Continue&lt;/STRONG&gt; to obtain the sample size (49, or 25 for each group, in this case).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 352px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/8340i36C987F3C44685DB/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will investigate further when I get a chance&amp;nbsp;to determine if there is another way or if I was wrong that you can use this method.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:40:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47287#M26961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-18T19:40:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47288#M26962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to do a two sided equivalence test.&amp;nbsp; When I ran it through Minitab I got 24.&amp;nbsp; I also used the folowing formula = (2*((-1.96 -1.6449)^2)*9.43^2 )/10^2 in Excel and got 23.11.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advise how I can obtain this from JMP.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47288#M26962</guid>
      <dc:creator>clt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-15T19:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47384#M27024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think that anyone should use the method I showed most recently for a two sample test. That result&amp;nbsp;is for&amp;nbsp;the hypothesized difference, not equivalence. MINITAB and your hand calculation provide the sample size for one population assuming a balanced design. I implemented the computation as a JMP script:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-jsl"&gt;alpha = 0.05;
beta = 1 - 0.95;
delta = 10;
sigma = 9.43;
ratio = 1;

z alpha = normal quantile( 1 - alpha );
z beta  = normal quantile( 1 - beta  );

n = Ceiling( ((1 + 1/ratio) * sigma^2 * (z alpha + z beta)^2) / (delta^2) );&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For this case of 95% confidence, 95% power, a standard deviation of 9.43, and a significant difference of 10, I get N1 = N2 = 20.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The result is for one sample. The sample size for the other&amp;nbsp;population is the ratio times the first sample size. The ratio is 1 for a balanced design.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 19:38:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/47384#M27024</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-18T19:38:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/87671#M38682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I totally got the question that was asked - to compare historical data with new data for equivalence test. I believe the recommended method through DOE route was somewhat not clear at least to my knowledge. I have asked the similar question also.... We have to use TOST for 2 populations and we would like to have a graphical presentation for regular audience. JMP may not have an easy way to do that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/87671#M38682</guid>
      <dc:creator>elu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-03T15:43:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TOST Acceptance criteria and Sample Size</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/90274#M38729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Select Analyze &amp;gt; Fit Y by X. Enter the measurement in the Y role and the grouiping indicator in the X role. Click OK. Click the red triangle and select Equivalence Test. Enter the practical difference and click OK. This result appears:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 561px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15006iC31929292CAD5DD6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See Help &amp;gt; Books &amp;gt; Basic Analysis for more details and examples.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 14:26:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/TOST-Acceptance-criteria-and-Sample-Size/m-p/90274#M38729</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-04T14:26:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

