<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Help for an experimentalist in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Help-for-an-experimentalist/m-p/2223#M2223</link>
    <description>Is there a straightforward way to run a simple analysis of covariance, and receive the ANOVA table as output?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How about any estimate of effect size, such as Cohen's d, Eta-squared, or Omega-squared?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any way to receive actual group means instead of least squares means in the post-hoc analyses? (see: http://onbiostatistics.blogspot.com/2009/04/least-squares-means-marginal-means-vs.html)</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2010-07-30T17:53:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help for an experimentalist</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Help-for-an-experimentalist/m-p/2223#M2223</link>
      <description>Is there a straightforward way to run a simple analysis of covariance, and receive the ANOVA table as output?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How about any estimate of effect size, such as Cohen's d, Eta-squared, or Omega-squared?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any way to receive actual group means instead of least squares means in the post-hoc analyses? (see: http://onbiostatistics.blogspot.com/2009/04/least-squares-means-marginal-means-vs.html)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Help-for-an-experimentalist/m-p/2223#M2223</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-07-30T17:53:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

