<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What to do with potentially Cauchy distribution of residuals (%growth data, including some negat in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36778#M21594</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For starters the first thing I would evaluate is how does this apparent collection of non-normally distributed errors affect the practical questions your trying to address with the experiment? I encourage you to think about the practical questions first, then let the statistics (of which the distributional shape of the residuals is but one)&amp;nbsp;guide you. If you've successfully answered the pratical questions that are being posed, and the magintude of the residuals is not problematic from a decision making point of view...well who cares if they are not normally distributed?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peter_Bartell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-06T15:23:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What to do with potentially Cauchy distribution of residuals (%growth data, including some negative)</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36735#M21568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am trying to run an ANOVA on a complex data set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Long story short, there are 4 fixed factors (a,b,c,d), and one random factor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;factor c is nested within b&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The data are percentage growth, like this: [(final-initial)/final]*100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some individuals shrunk (they are mussels and are known to do this), so I have negative values and some grew 100% (ie they are not bound by 0 and 100)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My residuals are not normally distributed, nor do they have equal variances.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In asking around, it seems the residuals may be cauchy distributed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found that cauchy distribution means you can't do regular ANOVA. Does anyone have any tips?&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Normal plot.jpg" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5460i209E315D6C014CC4/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Normal plot.jpg" alt="Normal plot.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36735#M21568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan_Haag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T20:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What to do with potentially Cauchy distribution of residuals (%growth data, including some negat</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36778#M21594</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For starters the first thing I would evaluate is how does this apparent collection of non-normally distributed errors affect the practical questions your trying to address with the experiment? I encourage you to think about the practical questions first, then let the statistics (of which the distributional shape of the residuals is but one)&amp;nbsp;guide you. If you've successfully answered the pratical questions that are being posed, and the magintude of the residuals is not problematic from a decision making point of view...well who cares if they are not normally distributed?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:23:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36778#M21594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Bartell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-06T15:23:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What to do with potentially Cauchy distribution of residuals (%growth data, including some negat</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36785#M21597</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for this. My advisor told me pretty much the same thing, but he's not stats-minded at all. This feels like going to the doctor to get a second opinion. Overall the data show a pretty blatant effect of the treatments, but not analyzing them in the exact proper method was like having a puzzle where you know what the image is, but not having all the pieces and refusing to put it down. Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/What-to-do-with-potentially-Cauchy-distribution-of-residuals/m-p/36785#M21597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nathan_Haag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-06T15:44:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

