<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced' in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36662#M21532</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not an answer, but has related information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2207548/slow-performance-on-windows-server-when-using-the-balanced-power-plan" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2207548/slow-performance-on-windows-server-when-using-the-balanced-power-plan&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-02T16:13:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36640#M21522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a script that I've developed that takes about 50 seconds&amp;nbsp;to run. &amp;nbsp;But when I move it onto another laptop it takes about 500 seconds to run (same version of JMP, different machine specs but arguably the slower machine is more powerful - faster processor, more RAM). &amp;nbsp;Strangely, if I change the battery setting from High Performance to Balanced, the execution time goes down from 500 seconds to 200 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;75% of the execution time is dominated by row selections, the rest by calculations. &amp;nbsp;I've tried to create a test script that mimics some of the behaviour - attached. &amp;nbsp;I've not fully succeeded in reproducing the performance difference between the 2 machines but I still see the strange dependency on battery setting:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;High Performance: 89 seconds&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Balanced: 38 seconds&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want to try the script, upon completion it produces a table with a script 'view log'. &amp;nbsp;This displays the execution time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts why the performance degrades with the high performance option?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36640#M21522</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Burnham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T12:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36641#M21523</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both machines are Dell XPS running Windows 10.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36641#M21523</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Burnham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T12:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36654#M21527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any chance the slower laptop runs hotter?&amp;nbsp; Perhaps the cooling coils cannot keep up with 100% CPU load all the time. They could be dusty or just not big enough.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36654#M21527</guid>
      <dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T14:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36658#M21528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PS: With three runs on my laptop the power setting made no difference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Balanced: 42.3&lt;BR /&gt;High Performance: 39.7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prob &amp;gt; |t| = 0.25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36658#M21528</guid>
      <dc:creator>ih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T14:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36662#M21532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not an answer, but has related information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2207548/slow-performance-on-windows-server-when-using-the-balanced-power-plan" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2207548/slow-performance-on-windows-server-when-using-the-balanced-power-plan&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 16:13:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36662#M21532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craige_Hales</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T16:13:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36664#M21534</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;David,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many years ago, I had a DEC laptop, that had battery issues. &amp;nbsp;It's visible symptom was an intermitent mouse pointer. &amp;nbsp;DEC investigated and it was discovered that the DEC design had the battery and the mouse using the same Interrupt. &amp;nbsp;Something like this might be going on with your issue. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 17:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/36664#M21534</guid>
      <dc:creator>txnelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-02T17:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'High Performance' Slow Relative to 'Balanced'</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/37068#M21764</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the responses. They helped me take a look at this from a different perspective - I was thinking more about my code than my hardware configuration. &amp;nbsp;It turned out that my power management settings when running on battery were somehow switched - balanaced was using full CPU power whereas High Performance had CPU usage throttled to 50%. &amp;nbsp;Having fixed that performance is now consistent across the settings.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2017 15:03:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/High-Performance-Slow-Relative-to-Balanced/m-p/37068#M21764</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Burnham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-12T15:03:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

