<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20235#M18450</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for notification of my request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Winfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 10:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dr_winfried_koc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-08T10:10:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20233#M18448</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The validity of the Proportional Hazards assumption is a prerequisite to fit the Cox proportional hazards model or to calculate the Log-rank test in Survival.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can we check this assumption in JMP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 07:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20233#M18448</guid>
      <dc:creator>dr_winfried_koc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-05T07:03:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20234#M18449</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, JMP currently doesn't have a way to test the the proportional hazard assumption as you can do in SAS, which is discussed in this paper. &lt;A href="http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2006/stats/MWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf" title="http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2006/stats/MWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf"&gt;http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings/2006/stats/MWSUG-2006-SD08.pdf&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-family: 'Microsoft Sans Serif'; font-size: 10.6667px;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But your request has been noted :)&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 17:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20234#M18449</guid>
      <dc:creator>jiancao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T17:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it possible to check the Proportional Hazards assumption in JMP?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20235#M18450</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for notification of my request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Winfried&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 10:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Is-it-possible-to-check-the-Proportional-Hazards-assumption-in/m-p/20235#M18450</guid>
      <dc:creator>dr_winfried_koc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-08T10:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

