<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nominal/Ordinal logistic regression in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15757#M14414</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ian, It took me this long to thank you... sorry. Much appreciated your comments on my question. --Erick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>illimani</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-16T16:32:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nominal/Ordinal logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15755#M14412</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: #333333;"&gt;I’m using a logistic regression nominal model for a response variable (pregnant/not-pregnant). My independent variables are: Time of insemination + Production type + interaction. When TOI (48, 52, 56h) is described as a nominal variable both PT and the interaction are significant. When TOI is used is described as a ordinal variable, only the interaction is significant. Why is this relevant to the analysis? I thought the type of logistic regression to be used (nominal or ordinal) was determined only by the data nature of the response variable. Many thanks for any help I can get. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2015 01:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15755#M14412</guid>
      <dc:creator>illimani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-06T01:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nominal/Ordinal logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15756#M14413</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To quote from the 'Statistical Details' section in the 'Fitting Linear Models' document "&lt;A name="96070" style="border: none; outline: 0px; background-image: inherit; background-attachment: inherit; background-origin: inherit; background-clip: inherit; background-size: inherit; color: #666666; text-decoration: inherit; -webkit-transition: color 0.5s ease; transition: color 0.5s ease; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"&gt;Factors marked with the ordinal modeling type are coded differently than nominal factors. The parameters estimates are interpreted differently, the tests are different, and the least squares means are different.&lt;/A&gt;​&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Take a look at: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.jmp.com/support/help/The_Factor_Models.shtml#93454"&gt;http://www.jmp.com/support/help/The_Factor_Models.shtml#93454&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;for all the details.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15756#M14413</guid>
      <dc:creator>ian_jmp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-07T08:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nominal/Ordinal logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15757#M14414</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ian, It took me this long to thank you... sorry. Much appreciated your comments on my question. --Erick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nominal-Ordinal-logistic-regression/m-p/15757#M14414</guid>
      <dc:creator>illimani</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-16T16:32:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

