<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Nemenyi test post-hoc for Kruskal-Wallis test in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nemenyi-test-post-hoc-for-Kruskal-Wallis-test/m-p/1340#M1340</link>
    <description>Is there a way to do post-hoc testing for the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data? I have searched the web and most use the Nemenyi test as described by Zar in Biostatistical analysis 3rd edition p226. I have a large amount of data and don't want to do all this by hand. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2010-02-12T08:10:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nemenyi test post-hoc for Kruskal-Wallis test</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nemenyi-test-post-hoc-for-Kruskal-Wallis-test/m-p/1340#M1340</link>
      <description>Is there a way to do post-hoc testing for the Kruskal-Wallis test for non-parametric data? I have searched the web and most use the Nemenyi test as described by Zar in Biostatistical analysis 3rd edition p226. I have a large amount of data and don't want to do all this by hand. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Nemenyi-test-post-hoc-for-Kruskal-Wallis-test/m-p/1340#M1340</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-02-12T08:10:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

