<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interpret the reliability test plan precision number in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11689#M11196</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like help interpreting the precision value that is calculated with the Reliability Test Plan tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>georgerapko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-31T17:00:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interpret the reliability test plan precision number</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11689#M11196</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like help interpreting the precision value that is calculated with the Reliability Test Plan tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11689#M11196</guid>
      <dc:creator>georgerapko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T17:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpret the reliability test plan precision number</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11690#M11197</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can read about the precision value in the documentation for Reliability Test Plan online:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.jmp.com/support/help/Reliability_Test_Plan_and_Demonstration.shtml" title="http://www.jmp.com/support/help/Reliability_Test_Plan_and_Demonstration.shtml"&gt;Reliability Test Plan and Demonstration&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We also have a white paper available that goes into more details about the power and sample size calculations in JMP:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.jmp.com/en_gb/whitepapers/power-sample-calculations.html" title="http://www.jmp.com/en_gb/whitepapers/power-sample-calculations.html"&gt;Power and Sample Size Calculations in JMP&amp;nbsp; &lt;/A&gt;(See Section 6.2.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically, the precision value is a measure of the width of the expected confidence interval for your test plan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11690#M11197</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_jmp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T17:44:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpret the reliability test plan precision number</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11691#M11198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Michael that did help a bit.&amp;nbsp; What I'm having trouble understanding is the results give here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample size 1, Censor time 106.9, and Precision 6.134 With the inputs: alpha 0.2, Weibull alpha 66.42, beta 1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I understand the precision value isn't symmetrical around the estimated Time of 6.99 given in the CDF plot with an estimated failure probability of 0.1, but I don't understand how to describe that value.&amp;nbsp; I used a Lower One-sided Interval Absolute Width to get the precision estimate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it correct to say the Point Estimate until we reach 0.1 failures is 6.99 hours?&amp;nbsp; If it is, how is the precision value described?&amp;nbsp; Can I say that I'll reach 0.1 failures at 6.99-6.134 hours?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11691#M11198</guid>
      <dc:creator>georgerapko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T18:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpret the reliability test plan precision number</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11692#M11199</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Time value in the plot is a Weibull quantile based on the failure probability and the Weibull alpha and beta values:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weibull Quantile( .1, 1, 66.42 ) = 6.99804544999282.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your example, the one-sided confidence interval for the time associated with a 0.1 failure probability is (6.99-6.134, +infinity) or (0.856, +infinity).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Michael&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:59:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Interpret-the-reliability-test-plan-precision-number/m-p/11692#M11199</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_jmp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T19:59:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

