<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inquiry about GAMP Software Category for JMP Software in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Inquiry-about-GAMP-Software-Category-for-JMP-Software/m-p/973546#M110608</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You might get answers here but this is not JMP Suppor. To contact them, I would suggest using &lt;A href="mailto:support@jmp.com" target="_blank"&gt;support@jmp.com &lt;/A&gt;email (&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Support/ct-p/jmp-support" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; User Community / Support &lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jthi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-26T09:23:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inquiry about GAMP Software Category for JMP Software</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Inquiry-about-GAMP-Software-Category-for-JMP-Software/m-p/973510#M110607</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear JMP Support Team,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are an FDA-regulated (GxP) pharmaceutical company and are currently preparing the validation documentation for our analytical software systems.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As part of this process, we are trying to determine the correct &lt;STRONG&gt;GAMP software category&lt;/STRONG&gt; for JMP Software. However, we have found differing opinions within the industry: some consider JMP to be &lt;STRONG&gt;Category 3 (Non-Configured)&lt;/STRONG&gt;, while others classify it as &lt;STRONG&gt;Category 1 (Infrastructure Software)&lt;/STRONG&gt;, depending on how it is deployed and used.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We would therefore appreciate an official statement from JMP on the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL dir="auto" start="1"&gt;
&lt;LI class="text-start"&gt;
&lt;P class="!my-0"&gt;How does JMP (as the manufacturer) evaluate or classify JMP Software under the GAMP software categories — specifically, does JMP consider it Category 1 or Category 3?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI class="text-start"&gt;
&lt;P class="!my-0"&gt;If possible, could you provide documentation or a formal statement (e.g., a vendor assessment, qualification letter, or white paper) confirming this classification, so that we can support our validation rationale with an authoritative source?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We understand that the appropriate category may depend on the specific deployment and intended use, but your official position would be of great help to our internal assessment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your time and assistance. We look forward to your response.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Inquiry-about-GAMP-Software-Category-for-JMP-Software/m-p/973510#M110607</guid>
      <dc:creator>PieValuesAlpaca</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-26T08:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inquiry about GAMP Software Category for JMP Software</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Inquiry-about-GAMP-Software-Category-for-JMP-Software/m-p/973546#M110608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You might get answers here but this is not JMP Suppor. To contact them, I would suggest using &lt;A href="mailto:support@jmp.com" target="_blank"&gt;support@jmp.com &lt;/A&gt;email (&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Support/ct-p/jmp-support" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; User Community / Support &lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Inquiry-about-GAMP-Software-Category-for-JMP-Software/m-p/973546#M110608</guid>
      <dc:creator>jthi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-26T09:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

