<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HPLC Equivalence Study: Simultaneous Change of Instrument and Column in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/HPLC-Equivalence-Study-Simultaneous-Change-of-Instrument-and/m-p/956788#M110129</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate your advice on the most appropriate statistical approach for an HPLC equivalence study.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Background&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to demonstrate equivalence between our current and future HPLC systems. However, two factors are changing simultaneously:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;the HPLC instrument;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;the chromatographic column.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In routine use, these changes will not necessarily be implemented simultaneously, but the study is intended to support the transition to the new configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Configurations Evaluated&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Old instrument + old column (current routine configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;B:&lt;/STRONG&gt; New instrument + new column (target configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;C:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Old instrument + new column (intermediate configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;same samples will be analyzed under all three conditions&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so the data will be &lt;STRONG&gt;paired&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Question&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which statistical approach would you recommend to demonstrate equivalence between the systems and, if possible, distinguish the effect of the instrument from the effect of the column?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am considering several options.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 1: Equivalence Testing (TOST)&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A vs B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A vs C&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 2: Mixed Model Followed by TOST&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For JMP users, have you implemented this approach using the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Repeated Structure&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; option, particularly with an &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Unequal Variances&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; covariance structure? If so, what were the benefits and limitations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 3: Alternative Approach&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Design of Experiments (DOE);&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Any other methodology you have successfully applied in a similar context.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Sample Size Determination&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would also be interested in recommendations regarding &lt;STRONG&gt;sample size calculations&lt;/STRONG&gt; for this type of equivalence study&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Study Limitation&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do not have the additional configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;D:&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; New instrument + old column&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your insights, experience, and recommendations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BayesKnight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-03T12:57:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HPLC Equivalence Study: Simultaneous Change of Instrument and Column</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/HPLC-Equivalence-Study-Simultaneous-Change-of-Instrument-and/m-p/956788#M110129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would appreciate your advice on the most appropriate statistical approach for an HPLC equivalence study.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Background&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to demonstrate equivalence between our current and future HPLC systems. However, two factors are changing simultaneously:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;the HPLC instrument;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;the chromatographic column.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In routine use, these changes will not necessarily be implemented simultaneously, but the study is intended to support the transition to the new configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Configurations Evaluated&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Old instrument + old column (current routine configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;B:&lt;/STRONG&gt; New instrument + new column (target configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;C:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Old instrument + new column (intermediate configuration)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;same samples will be analyzed under all three conditions&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so the data will be &lt;STRONG&gt;paired&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Question&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Which statistical approach would you recommend to demonstrate equivalence between the systems and, if possible, distinguish the effect of the instrument from the effect of the column?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am considering several options.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 1: Equivalence Testing (TOST)&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A vs B&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A vs C&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 2: Mixed Model Followed by TOST&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For JMP users, have you implemented this approach using the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Repeated Structure&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; option, particularly with an &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 1em;"&gt;Unequal Variances&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; covariance structure? If so, what were the benefits and limitations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H3&gt;Option 3: Alternative Approach&lt;/H3&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Design of Experiments (DOE);&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Any other methodology you have successfully applied in a similar context.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Sample Size Determination&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would also be interested in recommendations regarding &lt;STRONG&gt;sample size calculations&lt;/STRONG&gt; for this type of equivalence study&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H2&gt;Study Limitation&lt;/H2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We do not have the additional configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;D:&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; New instrument + old column&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your insights, experience, and recommendations.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 12:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/HPLC-Equivalence-Study-Simultaneous-Change-of-Instrument-and/m-p/956788#M110129</guid>
      <dc:creator>BayesKnight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-03T12:57:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

