<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lack of fit test in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Lack-of-fit-test/m-p/947094#M109726</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone. I have a question related to DOE.&lt;BR /&gt;When conducting a Lack of fit test, how should the F ratio be calculated? F=MS residual /MS pure eror&amp;nbsp; or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;F=MS lack of fit/MS pure eror. The idea is to compare the model error with the experimental error..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are the results obtained from the two formulas different? Which result is more reliable and when is it necessary to use each of the two formulas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The first formula gives a lower value of f compared to the second formula for the same data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would be grateful if someone could clarify this issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards, Milen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 09:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DiscreteIbex427</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-10T09:36:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lack of fit test</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Lack-of-fit-test/m-p/947094#M109726</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone. I have a question related to DOE.&lt;BR /&gt;When conducting a Lack of fit test, how should the F ratio be calculated? F=MS residual /MS pure eror&amp;nbsp; or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;F=MS lack of fit/MS pure eror. The idea is to compare the model error with the experimental error..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are the results obtained from the two formulas different? Which result is more reliable and when is it necessary to use each of the two formulas?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The first formula gives a lower value of f compared to the second formula for the same data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would be grateful if someone could clarify this issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards, Milen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 09:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Lack-of-fit-test/m-p/947094#M109726</guid>
      <dc:creator>DiscreteIbex427</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-10T09:36:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

