<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Bartlett-Test-in-PCA-Output-Exact-Statistic-and-Degrees-of/m-p/943420#M109571</link>
    <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am trying to better understand the Bartlett test reported in the Principal Components output in JMP, specifically the one shown in the “Eigenvalues” table with Chi-square, DF, and p-values for each component.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From the documentation, I understand that this test is used to assess whether the remaining eigenvalues are equal (i.e., a test of homogeneity after extracting the first k principal components). However, I would like to clarify the exact form of the test used in JMP:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="1" data-spread="true"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the exact test statistic used for this Bartlett test?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it based on a likelihood ratio involving the remaining eigenvalues (for example, using logarithms of ratios relative to their mean)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In the correction term of the statistic, is the number of remaining components (m = p − k) used, or the total number of variables (p)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The reported degrees of freedom are sometimes non-integers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does JMP apply an additional correction or approximation to the degrees of freedom?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is this implementation directly based on Bartlett (1937, 1954), or are there JMP-specific modifications?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would appreciate any clarification or references regarding the exact formulation used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 09:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>happy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-22T09:33:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Bartlett-Test-in-PCA-Output-Exact-Statistic-and-Degrees-of/m-p/943420#M109571</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am trying to better understand the Bartlett test reported in the Principal Components output in JMP, specifically the one shown in the “Eigenvalues” table with Chi-square, DF, and p-values for each component.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From the documentation, I understand that this test is used to assess whether the remaining eigenvalues are equal (i.e., a test of homogeneity after extracting the first k principal components). However, I would like to clarify the exact form of the test used in JMP:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL start="1" data-spread="true"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the exact test statistic used for this Bartlett test?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it based on a likelihood ratio involving the remaining eigenvalues (for example, using logarithms of ratios relative to their mean)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In the correction term of the statistic, is the number of remaining components (m = p − k) used, or the total number of variables (p)?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The reported degrees of freedom are sometimes non-integers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does JMP apply an additional correction or approximation to the degrees of freedom?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is this implementation directly based on Bartlett (1937, 1954), or are there JMP-specific modifications?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P class="isSelectedEnd"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would appreciate any clarification or references regarding the exact formulation used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 09:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Bartlett-Test-in-PCA-Output-Exact-Statistic-and-Degrees-of/m-p/943420#M109571</guid>
      <dc:creator>happy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-22T09:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Bartlett-Test-in-PCA-Output-Exact-Statistic-and-Degrees-of/m-p/943538#M109573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the &lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/19.2/#page/jmp/principal-components-report-options.shtml?os=win&amp;amp;source=application#ww113894" target="_self"&gt;documentation and references&lt;/A&gt; there in are not sufficient, then you might reach out to JMP Technical Support (&lt;A href="mailto:support@jmp.com" target="_blank"&gt;support@jmp.com&lt;/A&gt;) for further details. Keep in mind that some aspects of the implementation are proprietary and, therefore, confidential.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 15:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Bartlett-Test-in-PCA-Output-Exact-Statistic-and-Degrees-of/m-p/943538#M109573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark_Bailey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-22T15:46:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

