<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How does JMP bias the rate of count when calculating the probability of Partition platform with categorical responses? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-does-JMP-bias-the-rate-of-count-when-calculating-the/m-p/942452#M109507</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For categorical responses Partition has the response rates that are slightly biased away from zero to avoid having attributed probabilities of zero. I would like to know how to calcurate the biased probabilities.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Takashi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-17T03:41:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How does JMP bias the rate of count when calculating the probability of Partition platform with categorical responses?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-does-JMP-bias-the-rate-of-count-when-calculating-the/m-p/942452#M109507</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For categorical responses Partition has the response rates that are slightly biased away from zero to avoid having attributed probabilities of zero. I would like to know how to calcurate the biased probabilities.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 03:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-does-JMP-bias-the-rate-of-count-when-calculating-the/m-p/942452#M109507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Takashi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-17T03:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

