<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Making a custom design in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Making-a-custom-design/m-p/929359#M108670</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In the custom design when i create and one of the factors is set to hard, there is no d efficiency. When evaluating the table the d efficiency changes. why?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RatioHyena255</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-06T14:59:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Making a custom design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Making-a-custom-design/m-p/929359#M108670</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In the custom design when i create and one of the factors is set to hard, there is no d efficiency. When evaluating the table the d efficiency changes. why?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Making-a-custom-design/m-p/929359#M108670</guid>
      <dc:creator>RatioHyena255</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-06T14:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Making a custom design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Making-a-custom-design/m-p/929422#M108674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Without going too detailed, a&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;100% D-efficient design is typically only possible with an orthogonal, balanced, and unconstrained design space. When restrictions are introduced, a 100% efficient design is generally not possible because the constraints reduce the volume of the information matrix relative to the ideal (unconstrained) case, resulting in lower efficiency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="uJ19be notranslate" data-wiz-uids="XuTw3_i,XuTw3_j" data-processed="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="vKEkVd" data-animation-atomic="" data-wiz-attrbind="class=XuTw3_h/TKHnVd" data-processed="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN aria-hidden="true" data-processed="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="uJ19be notranslate" data-wiz-uids="XuTw3_i,XuTw3_j" data-processed="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="vKEkVd" data-animation-atomic="" data-wiz-attrbind="class=XuTw3_h/TKHnVd" data-processed="true"&gt;&lt;SPAN aria-hidden="true" data-processed="true"&gt;Your situation calls for a split-plot design.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 18:14:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Making-a-custom-design/m-p/929422#M108674</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-06T18:14:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

