<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912766#M107250</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Victor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is Design Explorer part of standard JMP or is it in JMP pro ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I haven't used it and I'll take a look. Bearing in mind that the trainees are totally new to DOE and JMP I have some concerns that Design Explorer might be a bit overwhelming for them. I was wanting &amp;nbsp;develop some very simple guidelines, but perhaps playing around with Design explorer I can construct these&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ar2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-12T09:06:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912749#M107247</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for some guidance from the group. I am preparing an example to use in training with Custom Design. I want to demonstrate a screening design with 5 continuous factors. I have a run budget of 15 runs.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using custom design main effects model with 12 runs (assuming default signal to noise assumptions) I get a power of 0.821&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is about the best way to use the extra 3 runs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL class="lia-list-style-type-circle"&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do I run centrepoints ?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do I run replicates?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do I do additional runs to fill out the design space?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm guessing it depends what my primary concerns are and the purpose of the screening DOE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am looking to develop some simple guidance for new DOE practitioners along the lines of &amp;nbsp; "if you are primarily concerned about better understanding the noise then run 3 centre points" or "if you are primarily concerned about .....then run 3 replicates " &amp;nbsp;or "if you are Primarily concerned about &amp;nbsp;understanding .....then do additional runs in different parts of the design space"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way I'm guessing the best answer might be to use the 15 runs and do a definitive screening design, but that is the topic of a separate module and I want to stick with custom design for this scenario&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for any thoughts&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912749#M107247</guid>
      <dc:creator>ar2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-12T08:18:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912762#M107249</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3005"&gt;@ar2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your situation, I would simply run all these scenario using&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.2/#page/jmp/design-explorer.shtml#" target="_blank"&gt;Design Explorer&lt;/A&gt;. You can then obtain a table with most of the design performance diagnostics, for different run sizes, replicate runs, centre points, optimality criterion, etc... It won't answer everything, but it's a good start, based on metrics and values. &lt;BR /&gt;You can see an example on how to compare different designs with the example I provided for DSDs here :&amp;nbsp;&lt;LI-MESSAGE title="Blocks and Center points for a definitive screening design" uid="767871" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Blocks-and-Center-points-for-a-definitive-screening-design/m-p/767871#U767871" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The centre points are commonly used for three main purposes besides some design performance metrics :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Estimate pure error for the lack-of-fit test, to evaluate if you model seems adequate.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Decrease variance prediction in the centre of the experimental space.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Detect curvature in the response(s). But this curvature effect can't be linked to a specific factor quadratic effect.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So the choice of adding centre points (or adding quadratic effects in the model with estimability "Necessary" or "If Possible" if you have a low experimental budget) is mostly guided by the prior knowledge you have about your system, and any quadratic/curvature effects you may have for some of your factors.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only situation you wouldn't cover with this platform is the augmentation of your design using&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.2/#page/jmp/space-filling-augmentation.shtml?_gl=1*wlq7ug*_up*MQ..*_ga*NTYwMzE0NjUuMTc2MjkzNDgwNA..*_ga_BRNVBEC1RS*czE3NjI5MzQ4MDMkbzEkZzAkdDE3NjI5MzQ4MDMkajYwJGwwJGgw#" target="_blank"&gt;Space Filling Augmentation&lt;/A&gt;. But in this last case, it's mostly a question of coverage of the design space than improving model-based design metrics.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this answer can help you,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 08:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912762#M107249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-12T08:51:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912766#M107250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Victor&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is Design Explorer part of standard JMP or is it in JMP pro ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I haven't used it and I'll take a look. Bearing in mind that the trainees are totally new to DOE and JMP I have some concerns that Design Explorer might be a bit overwhelming for them. I was wanting &amp;nbsp;develop some very simple guidelines, but perhaps playing around with Design explorer I can construct these&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:06:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912766#M107250</guid>
      <dc:creator>ar2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-12T09:06:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912768#M107251</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3005"&gt;@ar2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/support/help/en/18.1/#page/jmp/design-explorer.shtml#" target="_blank"&gt;Design Explorer&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;is available for every JMP licences (standard and Pro).&lt;BR /&gt;You can use it to test multiple options and then extract some knowledge/information from your testing to make the conclusions clear for the students (using visualizations and simple analysis to display the pros/cons of different situations).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As student get more comfortable with DoE, I would encourage you (and them) to use this platform for concrete use cases/examples, as it may allow them to better compare, evaluate and choose the designs based on relevant metrics, and it could be a nice exercice for them to explain and justify their design choices with the support of this platform, based on their study objectives on specific use cases.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912768#M107251</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-12T09:17:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best use of DOE Run Budget in Screening Design</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912778#M107253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Victor - I'll take a detailed look at the platform&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:48:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Best-use-of-DOE-Run-Budget-in-Screening-Design/m-p/912778#M107253</guid>
      <dc:creator>ar2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-12T09:48:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

