<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Query regarding design using categorical factors in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Query-regarding-design-using-categorical-factors/m-p/892653#M105376</link>
    <description>JMP student edition 18&lt;BR /&gt;I  was trying a custom design with 2 categorical factors and 3 levels. All effects -main and interaction show non significant p value despite using the recommended 9 run by the software.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manisha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-06T12:34:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Query regarding design using categorical factors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Query-regarding-design-using-categorical-factors/m-p/892653#M105376</link>
      <description>JMP student edition 18&lt;BR /&gt;I  was trying a custom design with 2 categorical factors and 3 levels. All effects -main and interaction show non significant p value despite using the recommended 9 run by the software.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 12:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Query-regarding-design-using-categorical-factors/m-p/892653#M105376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manisha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-06T12:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query regarding design using categorical factors</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Query-regarding-design-using-categorical-factors/m-p/892689#M105378</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/73634"&gt;@Manisha&lt;/a&gt; !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Welcome in the Community !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is your objective (s) with this DoE : identify important effects, optimize your system, test the robustness of your system against noise factors, ... ? What are your factors ? Why are they only categorical with 3 levels ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are many possibles explanations to why you may not find any effects statistically significant:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;High noise/experimental variability in response / inadequate measurement precision &amp;amp; repeatability : Have you any replicate runs in your design that may help estimate experimental variability ?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Factors ranges too small : in your case you're using only categorical factors, but are the levels studied different enough to see some variation ?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Missing of other important factors in the design&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Inappropriate model and/or factors definition&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Maybe these factors are indeed statistically non-significant and impactful on the response studied and with the levels tested.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;...&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding your design, I guess you have done all combinations involving your 2 three-levels factors (3x3). Maybe you could add some runs to have replicated runs and better estimate experimental variability, or adjust the p-value threshold depending on the power analysis : if you're very early in your study and regarding the small number of experiments, I doubt that a "standard" p-value threshold of 0.05 will enable to identify statistically significant effect (unless there are very strong effect sizes and very low noise/RMSE). You could use the Power analysis when designing your DoE with an estimate of anticipated noise in your response to adjust the size of the DoE and/or the alpha level (significance level). &lt;BR /&gt;What are the effects estimates ? Are they practically important ? Do they have a meaningful influence on the response ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can also read this similar topic (and responses) for information : &lt;LI-MESSAGE title="Using DOE result as a quantitative or qualitative prediction (based on effect summary)" uid="701873" url="https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Using-DOE-result-as-a-quantitative-or-qualitative-prediction/m-p/701873#U701873" discussion_style_icon_css="lia-mention-container-editor-message lia-img-icon-forum-thread lia-fa-icon lia-fa-forum lia-fa-thread lia-fa"&gt;&lt;/LI-MESSAGE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;With more information about your context it will be easier to help you,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 23:32:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Query-regarding-design-using-categorical-factors/m-p/892689#M105378</guid>
      <dc:creator>Victor_G</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-06T23:32:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

