<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do Map Shape data tables have to be locally saved files? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Do-Map-Shape-data-tables-have-to-be-locally-saved-files/m-p/870237#M103344</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems that the -Name and -XY data tables for map shapes have to be saved as local files.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to use data tables that are currently opened in JMP but not saved locally? I have tried but can't make it work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would be useful to have this functionality if (for example) a user is pulling shape map files from a database (say from table with multiple different wafer map shape files which is queried depending on which product is being mapped). It's possible of course to pull the shape data and save them locally, but it's an extra step to manage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>matth1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-25T11:06:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do Map Shape data tables have to be locally saved files?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Do-Map-Shape-data-tables-have-to-be-locally-saved-files/m-p/870237#M103344</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems that the -Name and -XY data tables for map shapes have to be saved as local files.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to use data tables that are currently opened in JMP but not saved locally? I have tried but can't make it work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would be useful to have this functionality if (for example) a user is pulling shape map files from a database (say from table with multiple different wafer map shape files which is queried depending on which product is being mapped). It's possible of course to pull the shape data and save them locally, but it's an extra step to manage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Do-Map-Shape-data-tables-have-to-be-locally-saved-files/m-p/870237#M103344</guid>
      <dc:creator>matth1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-25T11:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do Map Shape data tables have to be locally saved files?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Do-Map-Shape-data-tables-have-to-be-locally-saved-files/m-p/870251#M103345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have experienced that same primary restriction - jumps appear to require all the shape files to be saved before viewing. Moving forward, up on the wish list of what would be good improvements would be the direct handling of in-memory tables in dynamic workflows.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Do-Map-Shape-data-tables-have-to-be-locally-saved-files/m-p/870251#M103345</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmaraKazaame</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-25T12:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

