<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R^2 value standard least square with random effects in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869798#M103279</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;R-square is the amount of the total variation in the study explained by the model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-23T15:33:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R^2 value standard least square with random effects</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869782#M103277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was wondering when fitting a mixed model using standard least squares and adding random effects as attributes, is the R-squared reported an R-squared accounting for fixed and random effects?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869782#M103277</guid>
      <dc:creator>blip555555</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T15:25:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R^2 value standard least square with random effects</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869798#M103279</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;R-square is the amount of the total variation in the study explained by the model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869798#M103279</guid>
      <dc:creator>statman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T15:33:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R^2 value standard least square with random effects</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869832#M103285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.jmp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/67399"&gt;@blip555555&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;: To see what JMP reports in this situation, run the model twice; once with the factors' attributes set to random, and once leaving the factors as fixed effects. You will then know the answer to your question; if the R^2 are the same, "yes". Otherwise, "no".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/R-2-value-standard-least-square-with-random-effects/m-p/869832#M103285</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRB3855</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-23T16:26:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

