<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Saving a smoothed function of two variables in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829632#M101191</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've considered a parametric fit, but the model has to be really complex to capture many extrema and saddle points I need to have in the smoothed surface. I was looking for a 2D counterpart of a smoother with a flexible lambda. Am I out of luck with JMP here and have to resort to Python programming?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ansouk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-29T18:46:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Saving a smoothed function of two variables</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829501#M101164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to not only visualize a smoothed function of two variables Y(X1, X2), which is what I can do with a Contour plot in Graph builder with an adjustable smoothness parameter lambda, but also save a table of smoothed Y values Y&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;smooth&lt;/FONT&gt;(X1, X2). How would I go about it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829501#M101164</guid>
      <dc:creator>ansouk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-28T16:06:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saving a smoothed function of two variables</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829629#M101189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Try either the Neural or Gaussian process platforms. They should be able to fit a smoothed model to the data, and the prediction formula for that model that can be used create a table of smoothed Y values. &amp;nbsp;You can also use that prediction formula in the Profilers (Profiler, Contour Profiler) and Surface Plot to visualize the smooth fit to the data. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829629#M101189</guid>
      <dc:creator>MathStatChem</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-29T18:01:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saving a smoothed function of two variables</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829632#M101191</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've considered a parametric fit, but the model has to be really complex to capture many extrema and saddle points I need to have in the smoothed surface. I was looking for a 2D counterpart of a smoother with a flexible lambda. Am I out of luck with JMP here and have to resort to Python programming?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829632#M101191</guid>
      <dc:creator>ansouk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-29T18:46:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saving a smoothed function of two variables</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829833#M101217</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="hogi_2-1738274079438.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.jmp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/72401i259868CBD66E23AD/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="hogi_2-1738274079438.png" alt="hogi_2-1738274079438.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 21:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/829833#M101217</guid>
      <dc:creator>hogi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T21:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Saving a smoothed function of two variables</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/835518#M101304</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! The Gaussian process does work as a 2D smoother Y(X1, X2) I can save, but I have one complication in my smoothing task: the degrees of smoothing (lambdas, Gaussian widths or some other smoothing parameters) have to be very different for X1 and X2, because I know there is lots of noise I need to filter out along X1, but along X2 the complicate change profile is the actual signal I want to capture in the smoother. In other words, I need anisotropic smoothing. I tried "Estimate Nugget" option, but it seems to also be isotropic (no difference in degree of smoothing along X1 and X2).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 20:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Saving-a-smoothed-function-of-two-variables/m-p/835518#M101304</guid>
      <dc:creator>ansouk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-04T20:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

