<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pressure Test Method Results have a significant effect on my sample size and capability, how to avoid? in Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Pressure-Test-Method-Results-have-a-significant-effect-on-my/m-p/820997#M100001</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello dear JMP community&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will first explain the test method (no need to comment on whether it is right or wrong because this is what I got). The purpose is to detect a leakage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Measurement process&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Part is mounted to a pressure station&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pressure station rotate a vacuum pump x times to create a vacuum (atmospheric pressure is approx. 1000mbar)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pressure p1 is sampled at time t1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;After 15 seconds p2 is sampled at t2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Specification&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;700 mbar ≤ p1&amp;nbsp;≤ 750 mbar&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;p2 - p1 ≤ 4 mbar&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Situation&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is a leakage then the result can differ a lot from normal observations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Challenges&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;This cause two challenges:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;This have a very high impact on my Cpk and Ppk, which i have a requirement for.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I hoped I could use the continonus response to model my system but this is just creating to much noise and creating a lot of "outliers". When shifting to a binary response then my Power analysis for one sample proportion require a lot of sample to detect a difference in scrap.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone with some good ideas to how I could solve this puzzle?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 07:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>qLienceStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-06T07:58:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pressure Test Method Results have a significant effect on my sample size and capability, how to avoid?</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Pressure-Test-Method-Results-have-a-significant-effect-on-my/m-p/820997#M100001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello dear JMP community&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will first explain the test method (no need to comment on whether it is right or wrong because this is what I got). The purpose is to detect a leakage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Measurement process&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Part is mounted to a pressure station&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pressure station rotate a vacuum pump x times to create a vacuum (atmospheric pressure is approx. 1000mbar)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pressure p1 is sampled at time t1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;After 15 seconds p2 is sampled at t2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Specification&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;700 mbar ≤ p1&amp;nbsp;≤ 750 mbar&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;p2 - p1 ≤ 4 mbar&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Situation&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is a leakage then the result can differ a lot from normal observations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Challenges&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;This cause two challenges:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;This have a very high impact on my Cpk and Ppk, which i have a requirement for.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I hoped I could use the continonus response to model my system but this is just creating to much noise and creating a lot of "outliers". When shifting to a binary response then my Power analysis for one sample proportion require a lot of sample to detect a difference in scrap.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone with some good ideas to how I could solve this puzzle?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 07:58:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Pressure-Test-Method-Results-have-a-significant-effect-on-my/m-p/820997#M100001</guid>
      <dc:creator>qLienceStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-06T07:58:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

