<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic basic vs clinical JMP version to analyse Adverse Events in Mid-Atlantic JMP Users Group</title>
    <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Mid-Atlantic-JMP-Users-Group/basic-vs-clinical-JMP-version-to-analyse-Adverse-Events/m-p/60589#M11</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got a question whether the basic JMP version has enough capability to analyse Adverse Events or only JMP Clinical would be the option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Konrad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>konradkk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-19T14:15:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>basic vs clinical JMP version to analyse Adverse Events</title>
      <link>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Mid-Atlantic-JMP-Users-Group/basic-vs-clinical-JMP-version-to-analyse-Adverse-Events/m-p/60589#M11</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got a question whether the basic JMP version has enough capability to analyse Adverse Events or only JMP Clinical would be the option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Konrad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.jmp.com/t5/Mid-Atlantic-JMP-Users-Group/basic-vs-clinical-JMP-version-to-analyse-Adverse-Events/m-p/60589#M11</guid>
      <dc:creator>konradkk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T14:15:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

